ABSTRACT
Introduction: COVID-19 is an infectious disease caused by the SARS-CoV-2 virus that commonly involved the respiratory system. However, the virus can affect any organ in the body including the liver. Hepatic involvement in COVID-19 could be related to the direct cytopathic effect of the virus, an uncontrolled immune reaction, sepsis, or drug-induced liver injury. Background: The current study aims to evaluate the relevance of liver enzyme derangement in COVID-19. Methods: The sample size of 165 patients, tested positive for covid 19 and underwent liver enzyme testing. These patients were categorized into mild, severe, and critical diseases based on clinical evaluation, radiological findings, and biochemical parameters. Results: Of 165 patients selected 103 (62.4%) have mild disease, 40(24.2%) have severe and 12(7.2%) suffered from the critical disease. 48(29.1%) patients show deranged liver function. 83.3% of critical patients and 45% of severe patients show deranged liver function.9.09%of patients died due to severe COVID-19 infections showing moderately to severe liver function derangement. Conclusions: This study concludes that the severity of COVID-19 disease may increase due to chronic liver disease, particularly fatty liver. Atypical ALT and AST levels during hospitalization were indicative of liver injury and correlated with the severity of patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: Tocilizumab, an interleukin-6 (IL-6) antagonist, is being evaluated for the management of covid-19 pneumonia. The objective of this study was to assess the effectiveness of Tocilizumab in severe covid-19 pneumonia. Method(s): This was a retrospective, observational, single centre study performed in 121 patients diagnosed with severe covid-19 pneumonia. 83 patients received standard of care treatment whereas 38 patients received tocilizumab along with standard of care. Tocilizumab was administered intravenously at 8mg/kg (upto a maximum of 800mg). The second dose of Tocilizumab was given 12 to 24 hours apart. The primary outcome measure was ICU related and hospital related mortality. The secondary outcome measures were change in clinical status of patients measured by WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale, changes in interleukin-6 (IL-6) levels, secondary infections and duration of ICU stay. Result(s): Tocilizumab was administered between 3-27 days after the patient reported symptoms ( a median of 10.9 days ) and between the 1st to 3rd day of ICU admission (median of 2.1 days) . In Tocilizumab group, 16(42.1%) of 38 patients died in ICU whereas in standard of care group, 27(32.53%) of 83 patients died. The difference in clinical status assessed using WHO (World Health Organisation) 7 category ordinary scale at 28 days between Tocilizumab group and standard of care group was not statistically significant (odds ratio 1.35, 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 2.97, p = 0.44). Conclusion(s): Tocilizumab plus standard care was not superior to standard care alone in reducing mortality and improving clinical outcomes at day 28.Copyright © RJPT All right reserved.
ABSTRACT
Background: D-dimer and LDH are crucial biomarkers, particularly in view of the fact that they have been strongly linked to COVID-19 infection and have been linked to worse consequences in people who have severe viral infections. Objectives: To determine how D-dimer and LDH correlated with clinical effects in COVID-19 patients who were hospitalised and how they forecasted the severity of COVID-19 patients. Material and Methods: This was cross-sectional research conducted relatively early in the second wave of the pandemic. A total of 110 patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and admitted to the ICU from January 2021 to June 2021, were included in the study. The clinical outcome was evaluated in terms of discharge and death among patients requiring various forms of assisted ventilation. Results: The average age of patients was 53.16 years (+or- 18.47 years). 35.5% of the patients were with comorbidities of which diabetes, hypertension, and COPD were around 80%. D-dimer was deranged in 2.7% of the subjects and LDH was deranged in 60% of the study subjects at the time of admission. Coming on to the outcome, all patients were put on assisted ventilation with 71.8% on NIV, 20% on HFNO, 1% on CPAP, and 7.2% on MV. During their hospital stays, 6 (5.45%) patients died and the remaining patients were discharged. A higher D-dimer value (> 1.5 g/ml) during the hospital stay was found to be statistically significant with assisted ventilation and deaths of the admitted study subjects. Conclusion: In our investigation, the biomarker D-dimer value was more associated than LDH with mortality in patients with COVID-19 infection.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: Today, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19) treatment is an evolving process, and synbiotic administration has been suggested as a new therapeutic strategy. This study aims to investigate the effect of synbiotic supplementation in COVID-19 patients. Design/methodology/approach: In this placebo-controlled trial, 80 patients were randomized to receive oral synbiotic capsule (containing fructooligosaccharide and seven bacterial strains;Lactobacillus (L) casei, L. rhamnosus, Streptococcus thermophilus, Bifidobacterium breve, L. acidophilus, Bifidobacterium longum, L. bulgaricus, each one 109 colony-forming units) or placebo for two months. Inflammatory markers (Interleukin-6 [IL-6], C-reactive protein [CRP], erythrocyte sedimentation rate [ESR]) and white blood cell (WBC) count were evaluated at two timepoints (baseline, two months later). The measured variables were adjusted for confounders and analyzed by SPSS v21.0. Findings: All 80 enrolled patients completed the study. The study adherence was good (approximately 70%). The mean changes for IL-6 were not significant ( = -0.6 +or- 10.4 pg/mL vs = +11.2 +or- 50.3 pg/mL, p > 0.05). There were no significant improvements for CRP, ESR and WBC. Originality/value: Administration of synbiotics for two months did not improve inflammatory markers in COVID-19 patients.
ABSTRACT
Background: COVID-19 has caused a considerable number of hospital admissions in China since December 2019. Many COVID-19 patients experience signs of acute respiratory distress syndrome, and some are even in danger of dying. Background: to measure the serum levels of D-dimer, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), and neopterin in patients hospitalized with severe COVID-19 in Baghdad, Iraq. And to determine the cut-off values (critical values) of these markers for the distinction between the severe patients diagnosed with COVID-19 and the controls. Materials and methods: In this case-control study, we collect blood from 89 subjects, 45 were severe patients hospitalized in many Baghdad medical centers who were diagnosed with COVID-19 infection, and 44 were apparently healthy subjects as a control. The time of collection is from September 15 th to December 31 th, 2021. The optimal cut-off points (critical values) and prognostic relevance of D-dimer, Neutrophil-Lymphocyte count ratio (NLR), and neopterin were investigated using (ROC) curves analysis. Results: In severe patients hospitalized with COVID-19 the levels of D-dimer, NLR, and neopterin were statistically significantly higher than in control participants (P < 0.005). The D-dimer, NLR, and neopterin tests have areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves of 0.920, 0.90, and 0.74 respectively, and their critical values for the differentiation between the severe patients and control were 0.22 micro g/ml, 2.56, and 3.02 nmol/L. Conclusions: D-dimer, NLR, and neopterin levels in sever COVID-19 patients were higher than control, with values of greater than 0.22 micro g/ml, 2.56 and 3.02 nmol/L respectively was linked to a severe COVID-19 infection with good sensitivity and selectivity.
ABSTRACT
El virus SARS-CoV-2 continúa infectando a millones de individuos en el mundo. Aunque los síntomas más frecuentes observados en los pacientes con COVID-19 son fiebre, fatiga y tos, en los casos severos la hipercoagulabilidad y la inflamación son dos condiciones que pueden producir complicaciones y causar daño en órganos, poniendo en riesgo la vida del paciente. Con el fin de clasificar a los pacientes durante el triaje, se han explorado diferentes marcadores hematológicos, incluidos el recuento de plaquetas, linfocitos y eosinófilos, y la relación neutrófilos/ linfocitos, entre otros. Por su parte, para la evaluación de las coagulopatías, se vienen determinando marcadores como el dímero D y el fibrinógeno. En esta revisión se abordan las coagulopatías y los parámetros hematológicos en pacientes con COVID-19, al igual que las anormalidades en la coagulación como la trombocitopenia trombótica inmune inducida por las vacunas contra el SARS-CoV-2
The SARS-CoV-2 virus continues to infect millions of individuals around the world. Although the most frequent symptoms observed in patients with COVID-19 are fever, fatigue and cough, in severe cases hypercoagulability and inflammation are two conditions that can cause complications and organ failure, putting the patient's life at risk. In order to classify patients during triage, different hematological markers have been explored, including platelet, lymphocyte, and eosinophil counts, and the neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio, among others. Furthermore, for the evaluation of coagulopathies, markers such as D-dimer and fibrinogen are being evaluated. This review addresses the coagulopathies and hematological parameters in patients with COVID-19, as well as coagulation abnormalities such as immune thrombotic thrombocytopenia induced by SARS-CoV-2 vaccines
Subject(s)
Humans , COVID-19 , Prognosis , Reference Standards , Thrombosis , Blood Coagulation , Blood Coagulation Disorders , Blood Platelets , Vaccines , Antigens, Differentiation , SARS-CoV-2 , HematologyABSTRACT
Introduction: Various diagnostic tools are used to assess the severity of COVID-19 symptoms and the risk of mortality, including laboratory tests and scoring indices such as the Modified Early Warning Score (MEWS). The diagnostic value of inflammatory markers for assessing patients with different severity of COVID-19 symptoms according to the MEWS was evaluated in this study. Materials and Methods: The concentrations of CRP (C-reactive protein) (immunoassay) and IL6 (interleukin 6) (electrochemiluminescence assay) were determined, and CRP/IL6, CRP/L, and LCR ratios were calculated in blood serum samples collected from 374 COVID-19 patients. Results: We demonstrated that CRP, IL6, CRP/IL6, CRP/L, LCR inflammatory markers increase significantly with disease progression assessed based on the MEWS in COVID-19 patients and may be used to differentiating patients with severe and non-severe COVID-19 and to assess the mortality. Conclusion: The diagnostic value of inflammatory markers for assessing the risk of mortality and differentiating between patients with mild and severe COVID-19 was confirmed.
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: It is reported that patients with obesity are more frequently hospitalized for COVID-19, and evidence exists that obesity is a risk factor, regardless of other comorbidities. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of obesity with changes in laboratory biomarkers in hospitalized Chilean patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 202 hospitalized patients (71 with obesity and 131 without obesity) with a diagnosis of COVID-19 were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory (days 1, 3, 7, 15) data were obtained. We performed a statistical analysis, assuming significance with a value of p < 0.05. RESULTS: Significant differences in chronic respiratory pathology are observed between patients with and without obesity. The inflammatory markers CPR, ferritin, NLR, and PLR are elevated during the evaluated period, while changes in leukocyte populations are present on day 1 (eosinophils) and day 3 (lymphocytes). Finally, a persistent elevation of D-dimer level is observed, presenting significant differences on day 7 between patients with and without obesity. Obesity had a positive correlation with admission to the critical patient unit, invasive mechanical ventilation, and length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Patients with obesity hospitalized for COVID-19 present marked elevations of inflammatory and hemostasis parameters, with a correlation between obesity, changes in laboratory biomarkers, and the risk of adverse clinical outcomes also observed.
ABSTRACT
Ovarian Cancer (OC) diagnosis is entrusted to CA125 and HE4. Since the latter has been found increased in COVID-19 patients, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the influence of SARS-CoV-2 infection on OC biomarkers. HE4 values above the cut-off were observed in 65% of OC patients and in 48% of SARS-CoV-2-positive patients (not oncologic patients), whereas CA125 values above the cut-off were observed in 71% of OC patients and in 11% of SARS-CoV-2 patients. Hence, by dividing the HE4 levels into quartiles, we can state that altered levels of HE4 in COVID-19 patients were mostly detectable in quartile I (151-300 pmol/L), while altered levels in OC patients were mostly clustered in quartile III (>600, pmol/L). In light of these observations, in order to better discriminate women with ovarian cancer versus those with COVID-19, we established a possible HE4 cut-off of 328 pmol/L by means of a ROC curve. These results demonstrate that the reliability of HE4 as a biomarker in ovarian cancer remains unchanged, despite COVID-19 interference; moreover, it is important for a proper diagnosis that whether the patient has a recent history of SARS-CoV-2 infection is determined.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Ovarian Neoplasms , Humans , Female , Biomarkers, Tumor , Reproducibility of Results , WAP Four-Disulfide Core Domain Protein 2 , COVID-19/diagnosis , SARS-CoV-2 , Ovarian Neoplasms/diagnosis , ROC CurveABSTRACT
Background and Objectives: Due to the poor prognosis and the very high mortality rate associated with severe SARS-CoV-2 infections, various regimens have been tried to stop the evolution of the inflammatory cascade, such as immunomodulatory therapy and plasma clearance of the acute phase reactants involved. Therefore, the objective of this review was to analyze the effects of using therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE), also known as plasmapheresis, on the inflammatory markers of critically ill COVID-19 patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU). Materials and Methods: A thorough scientific database search was performed, and it included a review of articles published on PubMed, Cochrane Database, Scopus, and Web of Science from the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic in March 2020 until September 2022 that focused on the treatment of SARS-CoV-2 infections using plasma exchange for patients admitted to the ICU. The current study included original articles, reviews, editorials, and short or special communications regarding the topic of interest. Results: A total of 13 articles were selected after satisfying the inclusion criterion of three or more patients enrolled with clinically severe COVID-19 that were eligible for TPE. From the included articles, it was observed that TPE was used as a last-resort salvage therapy that can be regarded as an alternative treatment method when the standard management for these patients fails. TPE significantly decreased the inflammatory status as measured by Interleukin-6 (IL-6), C-reactive protein (CRP), lymphocyte count, and D-dimers, as well as improving the clinical status measured with PaO2/FiO2 and duration of hospitalization. The pooled mortality risk reduction after TPE was 20%. Conclusions: There are sufficient studies and evidence to show that TPE reduces inflammatory mediators and improves coagulation function and the clinical/paraclinical status. Nevertheless, although it was shown that TPE decreases the severe inflammatory status without significant complications, the improvement of survival rate remains unclear.
Subject(s)
COVID-19 , Humans , COVID-19/therapy , Plasma Exchange , SARS-CoV-2 , Acute-Phase Proteins , PandemicsABSTRACT
The characteristics, dynamics and mechanisms/determinants of the immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection are not fully understood. We performed a bibliometric review of studies that have assessed SARS-CoV-2 antibody responses in the pediatric population using Web of Science online databases, VOSviewer and Bibliometrix tools. The analysis was conducted on 84 publications, from 310 institutions located in 29 countries and published in 57 journals. The results showed the collaboration of scientists and organizations, international research interactions and summarized the findings on (i) the measured titers of antibodies (total antibody and/or individual antibody classes IgG, IgM, IgA) against different antigens (C-terminal region of N (N CT), full-length N protein (N FL), RBD, RBD Alpha, RBD Beta, RBD Gamma, RBD Delta, spike (S), S1, S2) in the case of different clinical forms of the disease; and (ii) the correlations between SARS-CoV-2 antibodies and cytokines, chemokines, neutrophils, C-reactive protein, ferritin, and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate. The presented study offers insights regarding research directions to be explored in the studied field and may provide a starting point for future research.
ABSTRACT
Ultraviolet C (UVC) devices are an effective means of disinfecting surfaces and protecting medical tools against various microbes, including coronavirus. Overexposure to UVC can induce oxidative stress, damage the genetic material, and harm biological systems. This study investigated the prophylactic efficacy of vitamin C and B12 against hepatotoxicity in UVC-intoxicated rats. Rats were irradiated with UVC (725.76, 967.68, and 1048.36 J/cm2) for 2 weeks. The rats were pretreated with the aforementioned antioxidants for two months before UVC irradiation. The prophylactic effect of vitamins against UVC hepatotoxicity was evaluated by monitoring the alteration of liver enzyme activities, antioxidant status, apoptotic and inflammatory markers, DNA fragmentation, and histological and ultrastructural alterations. Rats exposed to UVC showed a significant increase in liver enzymes, oxidant-antioxidant balance disruption, and increased hepatic inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-1ß, iNOS, and IDO-1). Additionally, obvious over-expression of activated caspase-3 protein and DNA fragmentation were detected. Histological and ultrastructural examinations verified the biochemical findings. Co-treatment with vitamins ameliorated the deviated parameters to variable degrees. In conclusion, vitamin C could alleviate UVC-induced hepatotoxicity more than vitamin B12 by diminishing oxidative stress, inflammation, and DNA damage. This study could provide a reference for the clinical practice of vitamin C and B12 as radioprotective for workers in UVC disinfectant areas.
Subject(s)
Antioxidants , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury , Rats , Male , Animals , Antioxidants/pharmacology , Antioxidants/metabolism , Ascorbic Acid/pharmacology , Ascorbic Acid/metabolism , Vitamin B 12/metabolism , Vitamins/pharmacology , Oxidative Stress , Vitamin A/metabolism , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/drug therapy , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/prevention & control , Chemical and Drug Induced Liver Injury/metabolism , LiverABSTRACT
Objective: We aim to identify the clinical characteristics and outcome of vaccine breakthrough infection in critically ill COVID-19 patients and to compare the clinical course of disease between vaccinated and non-vaccinated patients. Methods: A retrospective review of all adult patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the ICU in King Fahd Hospital of the University in Saudi Arabia with positive COVID-19 RT-PCR test between the period of January 1st to August 31st, 2021, were included. The recruited patients were grouped in to "vaccinated and non-vaccinated group" based on their immunization status. The demographic data, co-morbidities, modality of oxygen support, ICU length of stay (ICU LOS) and mortality were collected and analyzed. Results: A total of 167 patients were included. Seventy-two patients (43%) were vaccinated. Cardiovascular diseases were higher among the vaccinated group (33.3% vs 12.6%, p value <0.001). Requirements of Non-invasive ventilation was significantly lower in vaccinated group compared to non-vaccinated group (73.6% vs 91.6%, p value <0.011). The rates of intubation were similar between both groups. The total intubation days was longer in non-vaccinated patients compared to vaccinated patients and the median duration of intubation was 8 days vs 2 days, respectively (p value 0.027). In subgroup analysis, the P/F ratio was significantly higher in patients who received two doses of vaccine compared to single dose (p value <0.002). Conclusion: In critically ill COVID-19 patients, the vaccinated group has significantly less need for Non-invasive ventilation, fewer intubation days and less hypoxia compared to non-vaccinated patients. We recommend more policies and public education nationwide and worldwide to encourage vaccination and raise awareness of the general population.
ABSTRACT
Background & aims: Vitamin D supplementation as an immunomodulator has been identified as a potential strat-egy to prevent and treat Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We aimed to analyze the effect of 10,000 IU vitamin D3 supplementation on 25(OH)D levels on primary clinical out-comes (conversion length), inflammatory markers (Total Lymphocyte Count (TLC), Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR)) and coagulation marker (D-Dimer) in moderate COVID-19 patients at Wahidin Sudirohusodo Hospital, Makassar, Indonesia.Methods: We conducted a single-blind randomized -con-trolled trial on the confirmed moderate COVID-19 patients above 18 years old and low vitamin D status. Each of inter-vention and control groups were supplemented of 10,000 IU and 1000 IU cholecalciferol that taken daily for 2 weeks. Levels of 25(OH)D were analyzed for the primary endpoint (conversion length), then correlated to secondary endpoints (Length of Stay (LOS)), clinical manifestations improvement, and markers TLC, NLR, PLR, and D-Dimer serum, handgrip strength (HGS) as functional capacity measurement, after ad-justed to age, sex, nutritional status based on body mass in- dex (BMI) and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA) tool, co -morbidities, and anti-coagulant administration. Medical nutri-tional therapy was given and presented as energy, protein, carbohydrate, and fat achievement, and vitamin D intake was also calculated.Results: A significant effects was found in 60 samples with pre-intervention vitamin D deficiency (61.7%) and insuffi-ciency (38.3%) status, and 10,000 IU of vitamin D3 supple-mentation could increase 25(OH)D levels within 2 weeks to reach sufficiency status (16.7%). The Vitamin D3 supplemen-tation of 10,000 IU and 1000 IU could significantly increase 25(OH)D levels compared to the control group of 1000 IU (4.61 +/- 5.43 vs.-0.29 +/- 2.72;P <0.0001) and it was correlated to primary clinical outcome, which is length of conversion (6.53 +/- 1.17 vs 10.47 +/- 2.56;P < 0.0001). The increase in HGS (6.61 +/- 3.01 vs. 4.04 +/- 4.44;P = 0.011), LOS (11.63 +/- 2.5 vs. 14.73 +/- 3.45;P = 0.001), and improvement in clinical mani-festations were found to be significant in both groups. We an-alyzed changes the effect of vitamin D supplementation in TLC, NLR, and D-Dimer as marker of coagulopathy associated COVID-19 on both groups that showed were not significant. Positive and significant correlation was only showed on PLR levels after intervention (r=0.368;P=0.045).Conclusion: Supplementation of vitamin D3 10,000 IU in moderate COVID-19 patients had a significant effect on 25(OH)D level, length of conversion, LOS, functional capacity, and PLR levels, but it has negative correlation in TLC, NLR, and D-Dimer levels.This study has been registered in the ClinicalTrial.gov data-base with the identification number NCT05126602.
ABSTRACT
A longitudinal psycholinguistic study was conducted with 107 students from different Italian universities that produced daily photo-diary entries for two weeks, one at the beginning and the other at the end of the first Italian lockdown period, imposed in view of the rapid dissemination of COVID -19. The task was to take a daily photo accompanied by a short description (text). The texts accompanying the photos were analysed using Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) software to analyze linguistic markers representing psychological processes related to the experience of the pandemic and the lockdown, identifying potential changes in psycholinguistic variables useful for understanding the psychological impact of such harsh and extended restricted living conditions on Italian students. LIWC categories related to negation, anger, cognitive mechanisms, tentative discourse, past, and future increased statistically significantly between the two time points, while word count, prepositions, communication, leisure, and home decreased statistically significantly. While male participants used more articles at both time points, females used more words related to anxiety, social processes, past, and present at T1 and more related to insight at T2. Participants who lived with their partner showed higher scores on negative emotions, affect, positive feelings, anger, optimism, and certainty. Participants from southern Italy tended to describe their experiences from a collective and social perspective rather than an individual perspective. By identifying, discussing, and comparing these phenomena with the broader literature, a spotlight is shed for the first time on the psycholinguistic analysis of students at the national level who faced the first COVID -19 lockdown in Italy.
ABSTRACT
Hypertension is the most common concomitant disease in COVID-19. Although the increased mortality from a new coronavirus infection occurring against the background of concomitant hypertension has been proven many times, the greater problem is the search for prognostic factors that would allow predicting the risk of severe infection caused by SARS-CoV-2 and death at an early stage. The aim of the study was to determine the level of some markers of acute inflammation (ferritin, C-reactive protein, IL-6) in patients with a new coronavirus infection combined with hypertension. Material and methods. The study included 130 patients of two groups: the main group - patients with COVID-19, occurring against the background of hypertension (n=70), the control group - patients with COVID-19 of moderate severity without concomitant diseases (n=60). Criteria for inclusion in the main group: the presence of stage II hypertension (drug-controlled) and the absence of additional concomitant diseases, including severe obesity >II degrees (body mass index >35 kg/m2). Patients of the main group by age (from 38 to 65 years, average age 57.0+/-6.9 years) did not differ from patients of the control group (from 42 to 65 years, average age 53.6+/-6.6 years). Women prevailed in both groups - 61.4% in the main group and 70% in the control group, respectively. The criteria for excluding patients were: BDD no more than 30/min, SpO2 no lower than 93%, absence of a positive result of a study on SARS-CoV-2 RNA by PCR from the nasopharynx and oropharynx, CT changes characteristic of a viral lesion involving more than 50% of lung parenchyma (CT 3-4), IL-6 levels over 40 pg/ml, age over 65 years. Results. The ferritin index above 500 ng/ml was in 30% of patients of the main and 23.3% of the control group. Comparison of ferritin levels in the two groups showed that its indicators in patients of the main group were significantly higher than those of the control group (p=0.033;p<0.05). C-reactive protein (CRP) was also more often elevated in patients of the main group with arterial hypertension than in patients without a history of hypertension (55.7+/-5.1 and 45.3+/-4.6 mg/l, respectively), but the difference in the degree of its increase was not significant (p=0.132;p>0.05). The average value of IL-6 in both groups was within normal values: 8.9+/-1.2 pg/ml in the main group and 5.6+/-1.1 pg/ml in the control group (p=0.045;p<0.05). Conclusion. In patients with COVID-19, which occurred against the background of hypertension, there was a significant increase in the level of a number of markers of acute inflammation (ferritin, IL-6) compared with patients without concomitant hypertension. These changes may be associated with the effect of high blood pressure on the vascular wall, as well as with the tropicity of the virus to vascular endothelial cells.Copyright © 2021 Moscow State University of Psychology and Education. All right reserved.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To retrospectively analyse the clinical status of COVID 19 patients with CT and laboratory findings Method: A total of 250 RT PCR test positive patients data were collected during the period of March 2020 to June 2021. Results: Present study showed that patients who did not need oxygen on admission, 9% of patients had a severe CT score, 41% with moderate CT score and 51% with mild CT score. Those who needed oxygen 17% of patients had a severe CT score, 40% with moderate CT score and 43% with mild CT score. Study also showed that in those who needed ICU admission, 27% of patients had a severe CT score, 56% with moderate CT score and 17% with mild CT score. Laboratory parameters such as Lactate Dehydrogenase (LDH), Ferritin, C Reactive Protein (CRP) and D-Dimer showed a significant p value between severity categories. Conclusion: This study has shown that the CT severity score alone does not always have quantifiable relation to the clinical severity of the patient. In present study found laboratory parameters has no positive correlation between mild CT score, but with moderate and severe CT score scans, a significant correlation was found. [ FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research (Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research) is the property of Journal of Cardiovascular Disease Research and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full . (Copyright applies to all s.)
ABSTRACT
Background: Coronavirus disease 2019, first reported in December 2019 mainly presented with the symptoms of Cough, Fever, Shortness of breath, Myalgia, Weakness and anosmia. C-reactive Protein (CRP) is an acute-phase reactant protein which is synthesized by the liver in response to raised levels of interleukin-6 (IL-6) which is a biomarker of inflammation. Methods: This was a prospective observational study, done on 110 COVID-19 patients after applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Detailed history, vaccination status, presence of comorbidities and thorough clinical examination was performed. Serum CRP levels was assessed and Computed Tomographic scan (CT scan) of Thorax was done. CORADS scoring and CT severity grading as per CT scan was done. All the above parameters were recorded in the preformed proforma and data was entered in excel spreadsheet and was analysed using SPSS v26 software. Results: Majority were males (56.3%) and majority were from 61-80 years of age. Majority (57.3%) patients were non-smokers. Hypertension was the most common associated comorbidity (86.4%) (r=0.743, p=0.000). There is a strong positive correlation between CRP levels and CTSS in COVID 19 patients and a strong negative correlation between the CRP levels and outcome of COVID-19 patients (r=-0.449, p=0.000). Conclusion: Elevated serum CRP value is associated with disease progression and poorer outcome.
ABSTRACT
The use of computer-mediated communication including emails has become pervasive in academic contexts as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. What seems to be significant but simply overlooked by students is meeting politeness netiquettes while sending emails. To this end, the current study investigated the extent to which non-native English speaking university students adjust the level of politeness in their response emails written in English to that of the emails received from an American professor. To collect data, four versions of an academic email message with different levels of politeness were prepared in advance. The emails either included or excluded verbal and structural politeness markers and asked for the participants' demographic information and their reason for participation in the study. Then, 73 university students enrolled in a general English course were selected and divided randomly into four groups each of which received one version of the email message from the professor. The results of the data analysis on the participants' response emails, based on accommodation theory (Giles 1973) as a theoretical framework, revealed that they did not accommodate either verbal or structural politeness cues in emails. Besides, the participants' knowledge of the politeness etiquettes in the academic email genre seemed inadequate. Finally, the article provides some pedagogical implications for course designers, materials developers, and instructors to devise some plans to raise students' awareness of email politeness etiquettes and for students to be aware of the significance of meeting politeness principles in their academic emails.